Sour grapes for Liverpool manager after Chelsea draw
by stresster on April 23rd, 2008 356 words | 12 commentsIt’s not the first time that John Arne Riise has scored an own goal for Liverpool this season. Back in January, the Norwegian put the ball through his own net away at Luton in the FA Cup, can he make it a hat-trick before the season is out? Anyway, according to Rafael Benitez in The Guardian, the full-time whistle should have ‘peeped’ well before the Chelsea equaliser.
In fact, the referee appears to be squarely to blame as far as the Liverpool manager is concerned. Apparently, he made a number of decisions against the home team as well as adding far too much injury time on at the end. Was it inevitable that the arbiter would cop some flack from at least one team?
The disgruntled Spaniard said: “It’s difficult to understand. There were 94 or 95 minutes and every decision went against us. All the corners, free-kicks and fouls. But, in the end, it was an own-goal. It’s not the first time. We knew before the game it was going to be difficult [with this referee]. Against Marseille it was more or less the same. You can’t blame the referee for the own-goal at the end but the time? One minute in the first half, four in the second. It’s difficult to explain.”
Benítez also had cause to bemoan the referee for a push by Ashley Cole on the goalscorer Dirk Kuyt inside the Chelsea penalty area, an offence that went unpunished by Plautz. “The first four fouls against us were for pushing,” he added. “I saw one of their players pushing with two hands in the penalty area and nothing given. I’ve seen too many things tonight but I don’t want to say too much.”
You’ve already said plenty Rafa! It’s clear that much of his frustration is down to the fact that it’s now a tall order if Liverpool are to qualify for their third Champions League final in four seasons. It’s been a long time since they won at Stamford Bridge, with them needing a 1-1 draw simply to take the game into extra-time. Any hope for the Reds?
Related Posts:
Liverpool set for a busy week of wheeler-dealing?









Scooby - April 23rd, 2008 at 1:51 pm
Deflecting criticism from Riise I think.
Bill Vector - April 23rd, 2008 at 1:53 pm
Nope Scooby – he makes a valid point. The 4 minutes of extra time were partially down to Aurelio’s injury, the rest was down to Drogba’s flights of fancy, the cheating, diving turd.
TonyS - April 23rd, 2008 at 2:13 pm
To be fair every major decision has gone FOR Liverpool in the previous rounds against L’Arse and Milan!!
Anonymous - April 23rd, 2008 at 2:23 pm
scoucers complaining of bad luck and bad refereeing decisions… definate case of what goes around comes around me thinks
Bill Vector - April 23rd, 2008 at 4:38 pm
you thinks wrong suckface
Bill Vector - April 23rd, 2008 at 4:39 pm
you thinks wrong because you are stupid and go by the name anonymous
JJ - April 23rd, 2008 at 4:49 pm
Had to laugh at chelski celebrating riises’ own goal as if one of their players had scored goal of the season. If i were a chelsea fan id be worried that grunt has taken a 300 million pound squad added 30 million to it and made it worse..last two semis against chelsea ive been concerned by their quality, last night they were truly dire (as they have been for at least the last month) if it wasnt for cech liverpool wouldve been home and dry already. As it is scoring one at stamford bridge with grunt in charge isnt exactly daunting…
David - April 23rd, 2008 at 5:54 pm
I am sorry lads but it is written in the cards. Chelsea will win the Champions league hopefully by stuffing the other Northern crowd of prima-donnas. The only reason they won’t win the league is that Man U have constantly benefitted from the worst refereeing I have ever seen his year, and will probably scrape it on goal difference.
allahs boot - April 23rd, 2008 at 9:35 pm
If Chelski dont beat us to the final,then abramovich may as well take his money back to israel….
Squiddy - April 23rd, 2008 at 11:44 pm
Add 30 seconds for each substitution, 3 minutes for the Aurelio injury and 1 minute for Drogba and I’d like to know why there weren’t 6 official minutes of injury time.
Spladerunner - April 24th, 2008 at 4:14 am
Games between these two foes are always dire. They can be decided by a moment of brilliance or a brain explosion that leads to a goal or by a referee’s approach or decisions. Chelsea lucked out and as much it would pain Liverpool that’s just football. I believe Chelsea still have their work cut out for them and even though Liverpool have it all to do they’re perfectly capable of doing it. Chelsea will have to be a their best to fend them off and I don’t currently have confidence in the team to win when it really counts this season. I wouldn’t be giving the underdog tag to Liverpool. If it wasn’t for Cech the game would have been theirs.
dixiedeansboots - April 24th, 2008 at 6:59 am
Another example of moronic comment from Benitez. QUOTE: One minute added time in the first half, four in the second. Its difficult to explain. END QUOTE. What’s difficult? What?????? Because almost every game in the history of games has a similar amount of added time in the first half and the five minutes added at the end of the second was justified by the amount of stoppages that had preceded it. I happen to think that the ref had a fairly decent game and made decisions based on his viewpoint of the action at the time and NOT on the reputations of players and/or teams.Stop moaning Rafa – you’re making yourself look a smaller man than you are