Our demands of Premier League referees are totally unreasonable
by Luke Eldridge on October 8th, 2008Benjamin Franklin once said, “In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except for death and taxes.” Having died in 1790, he did not have the opportunity to take in the English Premiership, but had he done so, he would surely have allowed one more onto his list of certainties: the verbal bashing of referees.
This weekend, we had Blackburn manager Paul Ince, who felt he was on the receiving end of “A diabolical decision,” and claimed, “If the referee can’t see it then he shouldn’t be a referee.” At the City of Manchester Stadium, Mark Hughes was still not willing to accept Pablo Zableta’s red card, even after watching his studs-up lunge on Xabi Alonso on television.
At the Stadium of Light on Saturday, the reaction bordered on absurd. Talking of Arsenal’s disallowed goal against Sunderland, Arsene Wenger claimed “When we scored… the ball was not out.” BBC commentator Jonathan Pearce replied the incident was “Difficult to see from the replay, but the TV whiz kids have apparently shown that it was still in play.” The two happily concurred that the goal should have stood.
So, Messrs Wenger and Pearce, we couldn’t tell from live action or slow-motion replays and it needed technical experts to simulate the incident with a computerised graphic to prove the ball was not over the line, but you are willing to fault the (human) referee for not spotting it? One can understand that the pressure and adrenalin of the in-game situation could cause a manager to act with a degree of irrationality, but our demands of referees are completely unreasonable.
Just for a moment, imagine yourself in the referee’s position. At any one point in the match, you are required to enforce the laws of the game, control the play, be aware of what is happening off the ball, act as timekeeper, look out for infringements, be alert to injured players and stay close to proceedings. In doing this, you will cover a distance of just under ten miles and will gradually feel the effects of fatigue and dehydration.
You will be asked to use your judgement in enforcing the laws of the game for one and a half hours. During that time, you must have an unobstructed line of sight of all incidents (on and off the ball), because it is in no way acceptable for a single one of the hundreds of judgement calls you will make to be wrong. The many thousands of home fans will constantly barrack you and attempt to influence your judgement by screaming and shouting at every disputable moment. You must not let the views of these thousands of angry and abusive fans have any bearing on your decision making.
Referees are professional nowadays, so they have training to cope with all of the above, just as you and I receive training to help us in our jobs. But does that mean they can never make a mistake? Or is it that they can’t make mistakes that have substantial consequences, like disallowing a legitimate goal? There is no difference in the heat of the moment. When you know your work is going to be on display to the boss, you put a bit more time and effort into it, don’t you? Just to make sure. A referee doesn’t get action replays or thirty seconds thinking time, he has to take a split-second and whatever view he manages to carve out between the bodies.
Next time you are in your car, absorb the information of every road sign you go by. After you have passed it, recall what it said. Try it for an hour and a half and see how long it is before you make a mistake.
Better still, next time you watch a game on television make your judgement live. Definitively say to yourself whether it was a foul, a goal or whether the ball crossed the line straight away. Don’t wait for the replay or Andy Gray’s reaction; make your judgement immediately and see how many times you are proved to be wrong.
We're giving you £10 FREE so show some bollocks and BET NOW!
Tagged Under: Premiership, referees, wenger



Andrew Boyers - October 8th, 2008 at 12:05 pm
I think a lot of emphasis is placed on the introduction of video technology at the minute, and whilst I’m all for it in some form, I think what is also important to consider is the apparent lack of accountablitity of referees when they do make bad decisions. In any profession, individuals are held to account for the actions in some respect. In football, managers and players are subject to intense scrutiny from the media, the fans and the club, but it’s rare that you ever see a referee standing up and being counted.
Say a referee had to give an interview after each match, providing he or she with the opportunity to explain his decisions and perhaps admit mistakes if necessary. I’ve no doubt fans, managers and players alike would be far more satisfied with the outcome, even if it had gone against them. I agree that the way in which managers and players, even media commentators treat the referees is unacceptable. It’s an impossible job, as you’re undoubtedly going to make half of fans unhappy with the decisions you make.
The FA have put a huge emphasis on their ‘Respect’ campaign this season; it’s admirable, and sets a standard for aspiring children to follow, but would the referees not garner more respect by standing up and being counted where necessary? I know I’d applaude the first referee to do it, and I’m sure players and managers would too.
Jorge Bollix - October 8th, 2008 at 12:10 pm
Comparing the average spectator to the referee is bullshit. I would probably make an even worse referee than many of those practising said profession in the Premier League today, but then again, I’m sat at home while they totter about the field with their eyes closed. Everyone makes mistakes and that is to be expected, but when you unilaterally demand respect without doing anything to earn it you’ve gone too far. When referees constantly make mistakes they should be disciplined for them, be it a suspension or a trip down to the lower divisions. If all you have to worry about is apologising every now and then, there really is no incentive to better your performance. If you can’t do your job you have to move on - that’s not unfair, that’s life.
Andrew Boyers - October 8th, 2008 at 1:01 pm
I’m not suggesting that an apology will make things right, or that by them apologising, it gets them out of jail, and that’s the end of it. Obviously, if they’ve made a mistake, or keep making mistakes, then their position should be reviewed. I’m merely referring to the fact that there are often bad decisions made, but then no sign of a referee to explain the reasons he made the choice he did.
I’m not saying this should be the only repercussion - some form of ‘discipline’ as you put it is necessary, although whether putting them in a lower division for a couple of weeks is of benefit to anyone is questionable - would a week in League Two make them a better referee?
The way in which Rob Styles came out after the Man Utd-Bolton game the other week certainly got my respect, and I’ve no doubt the respect of his peers and players and managers too. Fair enough, he made the bad decision, but was willing to admit that.
It’s not the whole answer to the problem of the quality of refereeing, but in terms of respect, and the way in which players and managers interact with the officials, I think you would see an improvement.
Jorge Bollix - October 8th, 2008 at 1:51 pm
In my opinion you can’t just command respect, you have to earn it. Naturally this goes both ways. Just as there needs to be some assurances that referees do their job without bias or negligence the players and managers need to behave themselves when interacting with officials. And yes, it is good that a referee can admit his mistake, even better if he can learn from it. I know that putting referees on timeout because of their mistakes wont magically make them better referees but some consequences for their actions might make them strive to be better. Simply moving bad referees down to the lower divisions would of course be unfair to those teams and their fans.
I just think that for all their campaigning and window dressing activities the FA has done very little to actually bring about any change in attitudes or actions of those concerned.
gunner - October 8th, 2008 at 3:51 pm
i know referees make mistakes n always wil… but it seems there happening every other game now. its costs teams results n points in most cases and is not acceptable.
referees who continue to make mistakes should be fined or demoted to lower leagues. i dont know whether video replays are a good idea because it will lead to more conflict of rules, but they should be trialed atleast or should only apply to certain areas of the game i.e goal disallowance. also the option to have infrared lines over the goal line which will tell if a ball has crossed the line or not sounds like a good idea
with the technology these days surely something can be done to improve our refereeing system
ref's r dumb - October 8th, 2008 at 3:59 pm
shitty referees should be fired
if i continually fucked up at work im sure i would get fired. a referee has a job, if they cant do it then they shouldn’t be one
dont get me wrong if they make a few mistakes its acceptable, but constantly bad referees should be kicked out off the pitch.
that decision at reading is shocking, how on earth both of the ref and linesman did not see how that ball was three feet wide of the goal is extraordinary, the prem is one of the best leagues in the world if not the best, so it should have the best officials
f.a please sort this out
Luke Eldridge - October 8th, 2008 at 5:05 pm
Very interesting debate gents, so thanks for your comments.
The main gripe seems to be a lack of accountability and repucussions for a referee’s poor performance. Whilst they may not be visible to the average fan, the FA does a lot of work in this area.
The Professional Game Match Officials Board and their select group deal with:
- Selection
- Appointment
- Monitoring
- Training
In addition the PFA currently:
- Record and report on referees from the stands
- Mark them on fair play
- Incorporate their results into training programmes
Keith Hackett chairs a two-weekly meeting that:
- Evaluates performances using video
- Provides training and fitness tests
- Provides consultations with sports scientists and sports psychologists
And finally, Keith Hackett also:
- Spots and identifies refereeing talent
- Fast tracks the top performers
To say nothing is being done is incorrect.
BringBackBananas - October 8th, 2008 at 5:49 pm
that mite be their job description, or an action plan set out in an FA meeting, but what results of any of this is being seen?
gripes like wenger claiming the ball was still in play, thats an honest mistake. the human eye could never make a snap judgement one way or the other for that.
but for a ball crossing the goalline, the technology is available now with hawkeye so why not use it?
video replays is dodgy territory. because even for the most clear-cut of penaltys, there is always some element of doubt… (was there enough contact to impede a player? even if there is none or minimal contact, was it enough to gain an unfair advantage and block a goalscoring chance? handball or ball to hand?)
maybe an appeal system, 2 per game or something.
But 2 things that i think is should definately be implemented, and can be without any fuss is they should be obliged to give an interview after the game explaining their key decisions and performances.
Then, as they are proffesional, be made to review the game by video and retrospectively issue or rescind red/yellow cards, for fouls and more importantly cheating/simulation
I dont think the FA make it any easier on themselves with their appeal system. where certain cards can or cannot be downgraded or rescinded? where is the logic in that? and why cant bans be extended for serious foul play? all because of some law on paper, or whether or not its in a referees report?
if ANY evidence is available, it should be used.
Andrew Boyers - October 8th, 2008 at 10:31 pm
I don’t dispute for a second that the FA and the Professional Game Match Officials Board hold the referees to account. But why shroud it in mystery and keep it invisible?
Admittedly, washing dirty laundry in public is stupid, and there obviously has to be an element to this that has to remain behind closed doors.
But I’m looking at this purely from a respect point of view; if referees did give a short interview after a game, whether they’ve done anything wrong or not, then they would have some form of interaction with the fans, the players and the managers. I’m not suggesting this will answer the problem of bad refereeing, but I’m sure that seeing a referee stand up and be counted would garner the respect of his peers, and, in turn, contribute to an improvement of the treatment of them on and off the pitch.
I have total sympathy for them - they’ve got an incredibly hard to do. It’s so easy to see a bad decision from the armchair, but in a split second, in the heat of the moment, it’s a completely different matter. I think that, given the number of decisions they make during a match, it’s amazing that we only see the odd mistake from them.