Is Liverpool takeover now dead in the water?
by stresster on October 11th, 2008With the Abu Dhabi United Group buying Manchester City, it had been thought that Liverpool would be the subject of a bid from the Maktoum family. They have been long-term admirers of the Merseyside club, although this interest has never shown itself in the form of a realistic bid, or at least one that Gillett and Hicks have been seriously prepared to consider.
The Guardian now report that the chances of them buying Liverpool are more remote than ever, with the family surprisingly turning its attention towards Charlton Athletic instead. It appears as though the South London family club could be swept off its feet by some wealthy Dubai owners, after the latter put an ‘indicative bid’ on the table.
Charlton Athletic were last night the subject of a takeover bid by the Maktoum family in a deal that would seem to end Dubai’s interest in Liverpool.
The Valley club’s efforts to play down the deal last night by insisting there is “no certainty” that the “indicative” bid will become a formal offer will not restrain unbridled excitement in south-east London. The involvement of Sheikh Hamdan Al-Maktoum, son of Dubai’s ruler, Sheikh Mohammed, through his Zabeel Investments vehicle would make the ascendancy of a club that dropped out of the Premier League with only 34 points in 2007 almost a certainty.
Liverpool fans, had you remained hopeful that a deal could be struck, which would eventually see the back of your American owners. Or have you changed your view of the pair, in light of the fact that relations between them and Rafael Benitez have improved, and that money has been spent on quality additions to the squad in the summer?
Discuss the latest transfer gossip at the Brand New COS forum!


Alan Murphy - October 11th, 2008 at 11:03 am
I personally believe that if the reports that the Maktoum family are going for Charlton instead of Liverpool I think the future of our club wil be at severe risk. I am hoping that this story has been planted in the press to force the sale of Liverpool like I believe the so called Newcastle deal was.
Hicks and Gillette have to renew the finance on Liverpool in January (Or so we are told!) There two main loans came from Wachovia which was recently bailed out and Royal Bank of Scotland which according to the news is on a downward spiral. I think the owners know that asking for pathetic amounts of cash is now unrealistic due to world finances and they need to cash in now to have any chance of a good albeit greedy profit.
There is no chance of a new stadium within the next 3-5 years. They are not going to get loans when they ask and is it really worth risking their US based sporting interests propping up Liverpool. They are not welcome, they never will be and regardless of how many Torres’ they buy for us we will change our minds. They have yet to offer Benitez a new deal and considering the turmoil they have created, you have to take your hat of to the players and backroom staff for the level of committment shown over the last 2 seasons.
I would also like to see Moores and his pet dog Parry step down for putting Liverpool in a precarious position and allowing committed fans of our beloved club trying to figure out where the americans will lead us in the next few years.
chas - October 11th, 2008 at 11:23 am
With Beavis & Butthead in charge, we are DOOMED!!! OK we may do well this year but if they hang about they will put their stamp of failure onto us and we will loose our great manager our awsome players and we will languish into obscurity!…
What is the stamp of failure? Ask Texas Rangers and Brazil Corinthians.
I must admit that if the banks extend and renew their debt, then the banks are more irresponsible and incompetent than imagined!
take your pound of flesh guys and go back home!!
Dan - October 11th, 2008 at 11:25 am
You didn’t need to rely on the news that broke today that DIC or the Sheik wants to now buy Charlton to know any deal for Liverpool was dead in the water along time ago, you can blame it on Rick Parry and Moores, they let the Americans in and we are finding it extremely difficult to get rid of them, Parry and Moores can talk all the bullshit they want about the fact that they thought they were doing the right thing for the club etc but everyone knows their both talking shite, they were very sneaky and knew exactly what they were doing, one group (the two retards) were offering more money and higher payout per share and the other was offering slightly less but they had substancial more wealth. Choosing the highest bidder isn’t always the best option and in this situation it clearly wasn’t. It doesn’t take a wizzard to workout that DIC’s wealth dwarfs that of Hicks and Gillet, also the scary signs were there when Gillett hadn’t got enough money himself to buy originally and then came up with Hicks in the package within a week or two of his first bid failing, that is dreadful business, Parry and Moores if you are reading this just remember I FUCKING HATE YOU TWO BASTARDS, RUINED MY CLUB
Donavan Ried - October 11th, 2008 at 11:26 am
I think it was… That’s up until the credit crunch and the collapse of that big American bank, and like good sharks and business men; the Maktoum family smell blood in the water.
I think this would have affected Gillette more than Hicks. But will they decide it’s time to cut and run…
Alan Murphy - October 11th, 2008 at 11:31 am
Moores was awarded an additional £7million by taking the yanks offer. I live about 10 minutes drive from David Moores. If you have seen his house, you would know that the extra 7 million is essential for him to pay his bills.
Either that or he is one of if not the biggest greedy b*****d in the city.
As regards RBS. I have already closed a current account and saving account with them. That is something they can do without in the present day financial crisis.
Fernando - October 11th, 2008 at 2:02 pm
although it is unlikely does anyone not think there is a chance that after the detrimental effect all the gossip had on our title hopes last season may have been taken on board by the Americans and therefore they are keeping the business side of Liverpool where it belongs (behind closed doors) There could be negotiatians happening on any number of fronts which until decisions are reached are being kept quiet!
chas - October 11th, 2008 at 2:19 pm
Fernando,
I am of a like mind to you!!
I hope that I’m not just a total optimist clutching at straws but I’m hoping and praying that it all happening in the background and that we will wake up free of the twin parasites gnawing at the soul of our club!
I’m suprised Beavis hasn’t opened his gob to see that there are no negotiations, but it is ESSENTIAL that we supporters keep up the pressure and not bury our heads in the sand and hope that all will be OK because it will not!
We need action like Alan Murphy. Well done mate
I’ve refused to spend 1p at the club store/programs/food etc apart from tickets, as if I don’t buy tickets then some day tripper will take them regardless of the situation. I’m willing to support a boycott even if I have tickets and I think that this is what SOS need to organise.
A 15 minute protest outside the ground leaving it empty for the Marseilles game, as hopefully by then we will have 10-12 points, then we all go in late! OK we miss the 1st half but what a statement!! Fully televised, now can you imagine the impact that THAT will make !
True Red - October 11th, 2008 at 4:44 pm
I agree with most everyone that we need to get rid of G & H. What I don’t agree with is laying the blame on Moores and Parry. Yes, Parry is pathetic and shouldn’t be associated with the Reds, but I won’t blame him for allowing G&H to buy the team.
G&H fleeced us all. They said all of the right things that made us believe they were a good choice. They made Moores think so too. I wonder whether people are truly upset with Moores for selling, or are they upset that they too were fleeced?
I believe that the banks won’t renew the loans to G&H and its only a matter of time before this is all sorted out properly.
YNWA!
Red Biff - October 11th, 2008 at 9:00 pm
There is a chance that the Charlton bid, if it exists, is a smoke screen to try and force the 2 old gits hands.
With the markets in a nose dive, we’ve seen the banks draw on the hand outs from the Government. RBS was one of the banks to do this, so it would seem good business sense to claw back any risky loans. So in my opinion, Bevis and Butthead will be unlikely to have the £350m loan renegotiated.
With all this in mind, the Dubai group may fain interest in another club in order to unsettle the current owners and hasten any sale that might be on the table.
I could be totally wrong though, in which case, bring on the Indian fella!
YNWA
Donavan Ried - October 11th, 2008 at 9:25 pm
Alan Murphy - October 11th, 2008 at 11:03 am ….. Well done Alan. I like a man who puts his money where his mouth is, or in your case doesn’t……. Said this before ” Why don’t you lot boycot a League cup match” You have not spent any money in advance (Season tickets,Prem tickets) would really drive home the point if the ground was empty and only away fans were there…. and as you can’t buy tickets before hand for League Cup and FA Cup matches It will cost you nothing but the time to arrange it…
paul hates man u - October 11th, 2008 at 9:30 pm
why dont we buy our club if all of us put £30 down we could buy if off them. our club should be a gold mine but g&h keep diging there hands in
Donavan Ried - October 11th, 2008 at 9:31 pm
chas - October 11th, 2008 at 2:19 pm ……. If you have already brough your ticket it will not make a saller impact than selling no tickets at all……… But I love the idea doing it when the match is televised, That would make a statement
mark - October 12th, 2008 at 4:08 am
even if all the fans did boycott a game, you would still have bought the tickets, and thats all what the stupid yanks want us to do. missing the first half won’t affect the yanks one bit, they will probably be told by their posh butlers when they wake up in the morning that ; one of your many clubs fans boycotted the first half of a game last night, to which theirreplies will be- as long as they paid for a ticket
Donavan Ried - October 12th, 2008 at 11:20 am
mark - October 12th, 2008 at 4:08 am …. That’s why I said a League cup match as you can’t buy these tickets in advance so they raise no money ……. No advance sells as In the premier League
Donavan Ried - October 12th, 2008 at 11:22 am
Donavan Ried - October 11th, 2008 at 9:31 pm
chas - October 11th, 2008 at 2:19 pm ……. If you have already brough your ticket it will not make a smaller impact than selling no tickets at all…… sorry about the spelling
lfc 4ever - October 13th, 2008 at 11:00 am
kill the 2 barsterds
Adnan - October 15th, 2008 at 12:11 pm
yes the maktoum family is interested in charlton in the form of his sons zabeel investments. but the dubai royal family is huge, and they are linked with alot of proposed investments. i don’t think Liverpool takeover is dead, as the sheikh himself said he won’t pay more than the odds of 450 - 500 million, and wait until january when the american owners have seen sense when they will be declined another loan they will have 2 sell up, which gillette wants to do. The RBS who issued the lonas previously can also force the 2 owners to accept the sheikhs bid as they will want their money back, and in the current climate i think the banks wil be eiger to get their money back, aswell as all the bad press they are getting from the media and Liverpool fans they will likely do the right thing and not issue another loan deal. Next year Liverpool will have new owners most likely maktoums if not defo some1 else and i hope who ever it is will sack parry n moores who we shud all blaim for sellin to them 2 numpties. YNWA good luck on the rest of the season boys. IN RAFFA WE DO BELEIVE