Tottenham SHOCKED over recent events involving former striker: He won’t be coming back to White Hart Lane!
by offsidetrap on October 29th, 2008 14 commentsThe link connecting Jermaine Defoe and former manager Harry Redknapp came to an abrupt end yesterday after the club was informed that they wouldn’t be allowed to go back after the former Spurs striker. Pompey aren’t standing in the way of him making a move in January; you can thank the Premier League for keeping him at Fratton Park!
Redknapp himself even admitted he would be interested in bringing the player back to the club if Portsmouth were prepared to sell.
But now it has been revealed that Premier League rule L19 says a player cannot return to his former club within 12 months of leaving.
A spokesman said: ‘It is written in section L19 of the Premier League rules that a club which transfers or cancels the registration of a player may not apply to register that player within a year.
‘The only exception to that is if it has been made with the prior written consent of the Premier League board.’
The rule was drafted in a bid to stop clubs abusing the loan system by transferring them to another club and then having them back months later – essentially working as a loan.
There is currently a limit on the amount of loans a club can make and that would be a way around it. (Daily Mail)
I’m not shocked to hear that this rule exists. Unlike most sports, football players have the tendency to be one of the most fickle groups on the planet. One minute they’re sitting in a press room pledging their allegiance to a new club; it only takes a couple of bad matches for that warm feeling to go away. You have to impose this rule to keep players honest. For Defoe, this just means he gets to keep playing for a top six contender! It doesn’t look too bad if you ask me!
What do Tottenham supporters think of the ruling?
Related Posts:
Portsmouth keeper James tells fans why it is OK to boo Tottenham’s Redknapp and Defoe!




Jon - October 29th, 2008 at 4:13 pm
What Spurs fans think of this is that the clause:
‘The only exception to that is if it has been made with the prior written consent of the Premier League board.’
could easily be applied to allow the transfer to go ahead, it’s clear that the transfer would not contravene the reasons for the rules instatement, which were to stop clubs buying players and essentially putting them out on loan, so correctly applied there is no reason for the Premier League not to make an “exception”.
Park Lane Spurs - October 29th, 2008 at 4:20 pm
Am I missing something???
We sold Defoe last January and will be looking to re-sign him next January!! That to me is 12 months!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DAVID SMITH - October 29th, 2008 at 4:22 pm
I THINK THAT WE NEED STABILITY CHANGING THE SQUAD ALL THE TIME HAS GOT US IN THIS MESS IN THE FIRST PLACE.GIOVANI SCORED A HATRICK PLAYING ALONG SIDE ETU SO HE SHOULD BE PAIRED WITH PAV OR BENT AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS ALSO GIVE DEVITE A CHANCE WE COULD HAVE THE ANSWERS ON OUR DOOR STEP
Lars Larsen - October 29th, 2008 at 4:38 pm
So you’re using the media to illegally tap up players again, huh? Who’da thunk it.
Chip - October 29th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
What’s with this recent Defoe fixation? He may be a sentimental favorite, but if we were to swap him for Gio, Pav or Bent, it wouldn’t really be step forward.
JohnnyB - October 29th, 2008 at 6:39 pm
@Park lane Spurs; you forget that Defoe’s move was originaly a loan deal made permanent later, I’d assume that we couldn’t re-sign him from the date the deal became permanent.
Billiospur - October 30th, 2008 at 12:58 am
sorted..fing great
Cossy - October 30th, 2008 at 10:56 am
Um, don’t want Defoe back thanks, he’s doing well at Pompey and Spurs is in his past, lets move forward please and look at someone new.
This is surely all paper talk, just like Campbell coming back, papers are linking any Pompey player with Spurs and anyone with a Spurs history all the more.
mark - October 30th, 2008 at 11:59 am
I used to think defoe was over rated and greedy – he was at spurs.
He has definately improved. I remember a few seasons back when spurs played charlton and got a couple of opportunities to compare defoe with ben t- no contest – defoe miles better.
Comparing defoe to owen in that same period for england – owen – no contest.
So will the Harry factor at spurs be enough to bring him back, adams putting him on the bench, defoe starting to be a consitent goal machine and more importantly, a team player ………………or go for proven real class in owen?
Kenny Johnson - The Voice of Reason - October 30th, 2008 at 1:01 pm
The real shock here was letting him go in the first place….Defoe was always quality in my eyes and a born Spurs player…Nuff Said
sam - October 30th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
well dickhead levy must of known berba was leavin and chances r tht keane was leavin so he should kept hold of him!! but who cares pavvy and bent r top class and one more striker other than not so razor sharp cambell will be ace
smithy - October 30th, 2008 at 2:47 pm
NO DICK HEAD NO ONE KNEW KEANE WOULD LEAVE THAT IS THE REASON DEFOE LEFT BECAUSE U CANT PLAY BOTH OF THEM KNOW WE HAVE LOST KEANE DEFOE IS THE MAN AND HE SHOULDNT OF BEEN ALLOWED TO LEAVE BUT SHIT HAPPENS AND ITS HARRYS JOB TO GET HIM BACK. COME ON U YIDS
plums and pears - October 31st, 2008 at 12:36 pm
diddy micheal owen???!!! hes too small!!! a little maggott…….and hes shite!!
dc - October 31st, 2008 at 1:28 pm
Once again we need a defence more than anything.Score 4 away from home and only 1 point