Liverpool supporters: Do you think the club is taking the Liver bird drama a bit too far?
by offsidetrap on November 19th, 2008Tom Hicks and George Gillett have once again endeared themselves to the whole of Merseyside by sticking their sticky fingers where they don’t belong. This time they’re trying to patent the Liver bird for the club! Will these two goons ever quit?
It may be a mythical creature but the Liver bird has flown into a genuine storm in its native city after Liverpool Football Club applied to register the iconic image as a trademark. Liverpool have taken the measure to protect money otherwise lost to counterfeit merchandise. A furious council, however, has accused the club’s American owners, Tom Hicks and George Gillett, of riding roughshod over the city’s heritage. Caught in the middle, the Liver bird anxiously awaits its fate.
The row erupted after Liverpool made a £450 application to trademark the image that adorns its crest with the UK Intellectual Property Office. The club already has trademarks on “This is Anfield” and the words “You’ll Never Walk Alone” on its official emblem and is seeking the hat-trick to safeguard “the substantial amount of money” it loses each year to counterfeiters. The club will not, it claims, prevent other legitimate organisations from using the Liver bird logo. (The Guardian)
Ok, I’ll admit that trademarking “This is Anfield” and “You’ll Never Walk Alone” is a smart idea, but trademarking the Liver bird? Really, is that necessary? The club has now embroiled itself in another huge mess with Gillett and Hicks leading the charge. Who else would you expect to see at the forefront of a massive row in the city!
So what’s your take, Liverpool supporters? Are Hicks and Gillett taking the this trademarking a bit too far?


9torres - November 20th, 2008 at 9:12 am
Bollocks story ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Real Story -
A statement from the club said: “Liverpool Football Club is seeking to trademark only its own specific version of the Liver Bird, to combat its use in counterfeit merchandise.
“This does not extend to other versions of the Liver Bird, such as the city council’s or those used by other commercial or charity organisations.
“We have absolutely no intention of challenging that usage of the Liver Bird. We are simply trying to stop people lifting our rendition of the Liver Bird out of the official club crest and applying it to fake Liverpool FC merchandise.”
Donavan Ried - November 20th, 2008 at 11:39 am
9torres - November 20th, 2008 at 9:12 am ……… You are spot on there 9torres with both comments (Bollocks story, and the Real Story)
9torres - November 20th, 2008 at 11:45 am
Feel we’re a bit light on decent threads today matey
Steve Bott - November 20th, 2008 at 12:10 pm
No, the council are being way over the top - but then again what do you expect from an organisation full of amateur PC freaks who don’t have their finger on the pulse at all. Just a bunch of power mad wannabes with no brains. Long Live the Liver Bird and Liverpool FC’s right to use it!!!!
xxx Steve Bott
simon - November 20th, 2008 at 1:07 pm
http://www.tabletennistableshop.co.uk table tennis tables << signature
great post man
Coggin - November 20th, 2008 at 2:25 pm
If anything the Liver Bird has become regonised world wide because of the Mighty LFC and not because of the council and a few companies. But I also think the council are just being careful that what is in fact a symbol of the city is not taken away and that LFC are just protecting their rights to their actually logo. No harm done, but as 9Torres said “bit light on decent threads today “
gary - November 20th, 2008 at 2:58 pm
i think the mp’s are stirring the shite to bring the spotlight onto more of the yanks dirty deeds, the next few months will be very interesting to liverpool fans
9torres - November 25th, 2008 at 11:33 am
LIVERPOOL FC: you can take away the LIVER POO but we’ll still have L FC