A World Cup without Cristiano Ronaldo or Messi: It Could Happen
by Jacob Mier on August 25th, 2009 763 words | 26 commentsA World Cup without Ronaldo or Messi? Sounds absurd, but with Argentina and Portugal only two of several top teams stuttering in the qualifying campaign, it is anything but unlikely
With many having already written South Africa 2010 off as a tournament to forget before it has even begun, one wonders what the seemingly irrepresible doubters would have to say if Cristiano Ronaldo, Lionel Messi, Petr Cech, Zlatan Ibrahimovic and Samuel Eto’o were all absent from the tournament. Would this be a good thing? Definetly not. With Portugal, Argentina and France – three genuine contenders and obvious favourites to win the competition each time it comes around in the minds of most – all potentially not boarding planes to Johannesburg, the World Cup would become a five-horse race between Brazil, Germany, Spain, Holland and England.
With all due respect to the two teams currently ahead of Argentina in the South American qualifying group – Chile and Paraguay – they can beat Argentina and Brazil in as many qualifiers as they like, but it’s hardly likely they’re going to be able to pull of enough upsets to win the World Cup. Italy, too, can not be considered clear contenders for their own crown in my opinion – no team, no matter what they did four years ago, who is humbled by Egypt and massacred by Brazil in the Confederations Cup can hope to be taken seriously as potential World Championships. Especially not in a squad of players aged, on average, 30. 30! No, without these big name nations – and their star players particularly – the World Cup will be even less of a success (in terms of the quality of the spectacle produced) than the sea of cynics are currently suggesting it will be. True, organisation and travel were near-disastrous in the Confed. Cup, but football fans would rather travel four hours in the pitch black through hordes of striking builders and angered, potentially violent locals to watch Cristiano Ronaldo and Leo Messi than they would do to see Slovakia’s Marek Mintal or Gabon’s Fabrice Do Marcolino.
Yes, you heard me right – Slovakia and Gabon. While it is true we were all surprised when Togo made an appearance at the 2006 Finals, we can now see, fully aware of Emmanuel Adebayor, how they managed the miracle. Gabon, however, is another matter. Hull striker Daniel Cousin, who will be 33 when the World Cup comes around, is probably their most famous player, and they have never surpassed the Group Stages of the African Nations Cup. As for Slovakia, it is practically unheard of for a World Cup debutant to qualify from the highly proven and competitive European Qualifying section, never mind it by winning their group. Of course, it is superb that surprise packages such as these, as well as North Korea and (potentially) New Zealand and Bosnia-Herzegovina, continue to challenge our perhaps old-fashioned international football stereotypes. But anybody who says they’d rather see these minnow nations in South Africa come July 2010 than Portugal, Argentina, France or even Sweden, Mexico or the Czech Republic, is kidding themselves.
One minnow whose appearance in the Finals I certainly do look forward to is Honduras. Currently 3rd in a tightly-contested CONCACAF qualifying group ahead of Mexico and behind Costa Rica and the USA, the tiny Hondurans’ success should perhaps not come as such a surprise to us familiar with the talents of Wilson Palacios, his emminent Tottenham teammate Osmar Chavez and Wigan pair Maynor Figueroa and Hendry Thomas.
Although not as well equipped to face the World’s elite as faltering giants Mexico, who made up half of 2006’s one standout clash, incidentally with fellow big-name strugglers Argentina, it would be delightful to see Palacios and the rest of the European-based contingent (not forgetting Toronto FC playmaker Amado Guevara) make a name for themselves on the biggest stage. It would also present a fantastic opportunity for several of the undiscovered gems of North American football to put themselves in the shopping window. After all, on the evidence of Hendry Thomas and (probably) Osmar Chavez’s moves to the Premier League this Summer alone, there certainly seems to be a demand amongst English clubs for a Honduran fighting spirit – spirit they have needed in matches with fierce rivals El Salvador, whom they fought a war with in 1970 over no reason other than football.
And they we all were, doubting the footballing heritage of these “littler” countries – when was the last time England cared enough about winning football matches to go to war over it?.
Related Posts:
FIFA World Player of the Year Award Shortlist: It’s Leo Messi Vs Cristiano Ronaldo Again










anonymous - August 25th, 2009 at 10:38 am
A world cup without ronaldo I would not mind but a world cup without messi it just would not be a world cup in this modern age
anonymous - August 25th, 2009 at 10:56 am
ronaldo won’t make it. he’s just a totally diferent player when he plays for his national team.what a shame.
anonymous - August 25th, 2009 at 11:20 am
more of a chance for england…
footybanter.co.uk - August 25th, 2009 at 11:25 am
A world cup without Messi can’t be a good thing…especially not to watch.
anonymous - August 25th, 2009 at 11:58 am
i really hope new zealand qualify it wouldnt be the same without ryan nelsen
anonymous - August 25th, 2009 at 12:38 pm
it would be a disaster not to see leo messi in south africa. but WC without cristiano would be great, SUPER.
peterbevan - August 25th, 2009 at 1:41 pm
I see what you mean, and I’d be gutted not to see Messi there, cause he’s glorious but…
…World football is not simply the dominion of a few top sides propped up by global superstars. It’s supposed to be a celebration of a global cultural phenomenon, not a celebration of global marketing.
For every disappointed “fan” of Portugal cause Ronaldo isn’t there, there will be a delighted Dane seeing his team play in the biggest tournament of all.
We complain that our league is a procession of the same teams all the time, so why should we then laud the same thing in the World Cup? (especially as the WC is supposed to be the last bastion of football for the love of football).
Whoever is there, the point will be that the world will convene to play a few games and have a good time together.. it shouldn’t matter that a few “big names” are absent.
anonymous - August 25th, 2009 at 1:51 pm
Portugal can still guarantee a place in AFrica, They”ll have to win the 5 upcoming games. not impossible.
anonymous - August 25th, 2009 at 1:56 pm
who does ibra play for?
anonymous - August 25th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
ibrahimovic plays for Sweden …
anonymous - August 25th, 2009 at 10:53 pm
All the messi fanboys bashing on Ronaldo. To me it would be grat to see all of them. Portugal is amazing to watch play. I saw them ay sweeden in Porto and the 0-0 score is by far not a reflection of who clearly dominatedthe game. Portugal needs a stricker and trainer. Argentina is equally as fantastic, their biggest problem is a certain druged out had of god cheating overated reject called maradonna. They need a good coach. The favorites are by far Spain followed by brazil. Spain is gods gift to the beautiful game, they undid the ugliness that Greece created in the previous euro. Conclusion… A cup without CR and Messi will suck.
anonymous - August 26th, 2009 at 2:56 am
A world cup without messi and ronaldo will be such a shame.Two of the finest players in the game would not be contesting in the wc, I will not watch the wc 2010.
anonymous - August 26th, 2009 at 6:41 pm
get over it…peter is right. who cares if ronaldo and ibra miss out…as for argentina…that ain’t gonna happen. Even if it does happen new stars will emerge and it will be awesome.
anonymous - August 27th, 2009 at 7:21 pm
I think ronaldo is better than messi .But this year messi win ,and ronaldo with realmadrid win champions leauge and laliga %100
anonymous - August 27th, 2009 at 10:40 pm
A WC without Ronaldo would be awesome. He think he’s too good. But a WC without Messi would be devastating. Even though Argentina is not my favorite team, Messi is by far by favorite player. He’s so talented. MUCH BETTER than Ronaldo!
anonymous - August 27th, 2009 at 11:12 pm
Ronaldo ronaldo is bettar than messi
anonymous - August 27th, 2009 at 11:13 pm
1000000 messi =one ronaldo . Realmadrid win champions leauge by him.
anonymous - August 27th, 2009 at 11:14 pm
Kaka is bettar than ronaldo and messi
anonymous - August 27th, 2009 at 11:18 pm
No messi is better than the all
anonymous - September 2nd, 2009 at 3:29 pm
As a diehard Chilean fan who loves Argentina’s game, I can humbly say this: The only WC I wouldn’t care much about would be one without Brazil in it. Brazil is THE team to beat. Period. Everybody else is expendable for the spectacle.
What do I think about a WC without ARG, ENG, ITA, GER, or FRA? That means that the game is getting more competitive than ever before, that a new breed of contenders from every confederation is rising, and that there should be a new way of looking at the MOST BEAUTIFUL GAME.
anonymous - September 8th, 2009 at 2:59 pm
Messi = future legend
ronaldo = fag
Argentina Rules
portugal sucks
anonymous - September 14th, 2009 at 12:20 pm
meh. Ronaldo will be there. The REAL Ronaldo. Christina will have to watch him from home and see there’s only One Ronaldo and he’s not Portuguese.
anonymous - September 14th, 2009 at 7:31 pm
Lionel Messi Win C.Ronaldo lost
anonymous - October 8th, 2009 at 4:27 pm
you need a WC cup with Brazil, Argentina, England, Italy, Germany, Holland and France. Spain just came to light recently. But the way they play i would definately substiute them for Germany and Italy.
anonymous - October 11th, 2009 at 11:39 am
suomi kisoihin kts
Retryboy - October 14th, 2009 at 9:28 pm
The best teams should be there some of the groupings are wrong with regards to the quota from the different continents i mean south america should obviously get more teams through than north america because of the great history of success from brazil, argentina and uruguay