The £250m Decision That Could Help Liverpool Turn the Corner
by YNWA on November 8th, 2009 939 words | 22 commentsMoney makes the world go round, the world go round…
Join Our Facebook Fan Page for the Latest News/Rumours/Forums/Videos/WAGS/Funny Stuff/Features!
Portsmouth Vs Liverpool Tickets Still Available!

LIVERPOOL will brush off the controversy over England’s top clubs selling naming rights to their stadiums and chase the most expensive naming rights deal in the history of sport. Despite the recession, the Merseyside club’s hierarchy are convinced they can raise a mammoth £250m by persuading a leading global firm to buy the rights to name Liverpool’s proposed ground.
Liverpool’s owners, Tom Hicks and George Gillett, have been buoyed by their record £20m-per-season shirt sponsorship agreement signed recently with Standard Chartered, taking it as proof of the world-wide appeal of the club and the Premier League. These factors have persuaded Hicks and Gillett to revisit stadium-building plans, shelved due to Liverpool’s debts. The two Americans now believe they can underwrite more than 50% of the cost of building a new ground on a site earmarked on Stanley Park through a world-record naming rights sale.
The benchmark they have set Liverpool’s commercial team is the deal signed between the New York Mets baseball franchise and Citigroup. The American financial services giant paid $20m (£12m) a year over 20 years to have a new stadium, Citi Field, opened by the Mets early in 2009. Liverpool believe they can outstrip that. “Naming rights are a global market,” said Hicks. “We likely will partner with someone wanting global branding, unlike the US stadiums, which only worry about TV appeal in the States, similar to why Standard Chartered chose to partner with us on our shirts.”
Despite debts approaching £300m and Liverpool’s onfield worries, Hicks remains bullish about the outlook for his club. He said Rafael Benitez would not be forced to sell star players even if Liverpool fail to qualify for the knockout stages of the Champions League. Hicks and Gillett are seeking new investors, in the hope of raising money to reduce the club’s debt by diluting their shareholding, and spoke of “significant interest”. They are undeterred by protests by Newcastle fans in response to their club’s stadium being renamed sportsdirect.com@St James’ Park Stadium and criticism of Chelsea, who last week announced they were looking to sell off naming rights to Stamford Bridge in the hope of raising £150m.
Liverpool believe their situation is different, because they are building a new stadium rather than renaming an existing one. They regard as a precedent Arsenal, who signed a £100m 15-year deal with Emirates, which also included shirt sponsorship, when they moved from Highbury in 2006. Manchester United are the only Big Four club for whom a naming rights sale does not appear an option. A club source said a rights sale involving Old Trafford is “not on our agenda”. Sir Alex Ferguson said Chelsea’s plans were driven by money. “It is the only reason I can think of. But it does not really concern me. I wouldn’t have thought [it would happen at United].” (Times Online)
Now this is a tricky issue to deal with without getting too bogged down with issues of tradition and custom. Obviously the idea of naming the new stadium in any way that doesn’t involve the use of the word ‘Anfield’ or slightly amending it’s title with the addition of a sponsor should be done with as much care and attention as possible and not simply used in a mistaken way as it has been done at Newcastle United.
The money generated by such a move is too much to turn down and given the financial situation we find ourselves in it may well be the easiest way to make easy money. Now I for one would have preferred we went down this route under different owners but it does seem that this move would have occurred sooner or later and clearly if/when our move from Anfield takes place, if it ever does, then this issue would have been broached.
Now we can only hope that any move to name the new stadium can be achieved without a) it becoming some self promotion exercise for Messrs Hicks and Gillett, as it has done with Mike Ashley and his Sports Direct company and that b) any new name can still incorporate the word ‘Anfield’.
As a club we are swimming in self induced debt brought on by the manner in which our owners were allowed to purchase the club with debts that we now find ourselves forking out millions just to cover the interest payments on. If such a move helps get the whole process of building the new stadium underway then that too is a necessary evil as long as again it isn’t just a way for our American owners to avoid sinking some of their own money into the project.
Clearly we don’t want to have a stadium with a silly name. Pizza Hut Park is one such type of naming we want to avoid but I guess any such issue will fall to the highest bidder, whomever that may be.
Sooner or later I imagine that most stadia will end up being sponsored in some manner and even though the idea of such a thing does in some way make me yearn for an age when the game wasn’t literally all about money, it is something that will need to be done and as long as it can be done with the utmost respect and delicacy then all well and good. However given the two men in charge of the whole proceedings, Tom Hicks and George Gillett, I do fear for what we could end up with. The Burger King Palace anyone?
YNWA
Related Posts:
Some Fantastic News for Liverpool Football Club: Bye Bye Hicks and Gillett?









anonymous - November 8th, 2009 at 1:35 pm
I agree that this was inevitable but with those two clowns in charge of it, you know it will end in tears
anonymous - November 8th, 2009 at 1:35 pm
in some ways a good idea and wouldnt mind the stadium being rebuilt to house more fans as we do fill it pretty much every time we play in a league game….however ANFIELD has possibly the richest club history in english football….
JOHN LFC - November 8th, 2009 at 2:02 pm
Whats wrong with Burger King Palace?
Stillontheperch - November 8th, 2009 at 2:11 pm
Paella Palace has a better ring and is perhaps more apt.
JOHN LFC - November 8th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
The name of ANFIELD will not die out so dont worry. It provides Liverpool with alot of money having said that, i would rather call it “The New Anfield”.
anonymous - November 8th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
the ronald mc donald stadium
John Conor - November 8th, 2009 at 2:37 pm
Take the money and run!! With the financial situation at the min we need everything we can get! As as was pointed out in the article its not like were renaming Anfield here, we can only hope the the yanks dont make a botched job of it like that idot Ashly
anonymous - November 8th, 2009 at 2:42 pm
£250m for Naming Rights?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Aquaman - November 8th, 2009 at 2:45 pm
Let’s give the owners at least a hint of credit. Yes they will probably go for the highest bidder, but the chances of that being some kind of fast food joint are very small. Probably the worst we will get is Coca Cola and personally I don’t think that’s too bad.
Selling the stadium’s name is always going to be a tricky business and calls for a lot of faith from the fans. Unfortunately said faith is in short supply which means that the owners are under pressure. I’m sure we’d all be willing to go along with this, if only so that we can get our damn stadium. The owner’s probably know this but they should also know that if they try to cheat us again with some cheesy name, then we will take to the streets and get them kicked out. They’ve seen the protests and I’m sure they are a little nervous, so let’s give them some credit and assume that they have intelligence not to insult us directly.
Plus I think Purslow understands us fans a hell of a lot better than Parry did and he’ll be the one making the final decision. I trust Purslow so I think this is in good hands.
anonymous - November 8th, 2009 at 2:58 pm
this is disgrace for the club. we will never allow our stadium to be named … burgers club. fk no!
anonymous - November 8th, 2009 at 3:00 pm
WHATS THE BIG DEAL? IT WILL STILL BE IN ANFIELD AND WONT BE HARD TO GET A DEAL DONE LOOK AT THE GUNNERS!
anonymous - November 8th, 2009 at 4:27 pm
Dont care what they call it, even if they called it something daft. After the first year no one will care and we will still have a great new stadium. So does anyone really care about the name, Bigger stadium, more money thats all that really matters isnt it.
anonymous - November 8th, 2009 at 4:37 pm
For 250k, the highest fee in the history of sponsorship, they can call it anything, someone will eventually come up with a cool nickname that will catch on. I always loved the name The Emerites does sound great!!!
...samlfc.... - November 8th, 2009 at 4:39 pm
I can think of good points and bad points about this stadium
Good points:
more capacity – bigger atmosphere
The stadium looks stunning – could be very intimidating for other teams
We are can create history
Bad points:
Our history in Anfield won’t be forgotten but it might not feel right because Liverpool is associated with Anfield and it goes together like bread and butter and leaving Anfield would be like loosing a limb
Red_Phoenix - November 8th, 2009 at 4:52 pm
As long as the club is still known as Liverpool Football Club, the name of the stadium shouldn’t really matter. A naming rights deal’ generates much needed revenue and we’d be able to compete with chelsea and the mancs sooner rather than later.
Ok, the profile of the sponsor is raised as opposed to our name but when we start winning the league and being a mega club, no one at Liverpool is going to care. Shirt sponsorship made the name of a company synonymous with Liverpool Football Club e.g Candy, Carlsberg and soon to be Standard Chartered Bank. One more name shouldn’t hurt and as long the fans are still the 12th man
Red_Phoenix - November 8th, 2009 at 4:58 pm
Sorry i meant to say that as long as the fans are still the 12th man it shouldn’t matter as we wont be singing the name of the stadium. We can still pass on the traditions of Liverpool Football Club, Anfield included
Reds Lewis - November 8th, 2009 at 6:01 pm
250million is alot…
and if the new stadium is named something like “example”
the LG stadium of anfield grounds
or something similar, then i wouldnt be bothered
anonymous - November 8th, 2009 at 6:22 pm
In our hearts of hearts it will always be knowns as Anfield.
Its the thought of takng these two clowns to another stadium that worrys me.
If they broker this mssive deal it will only give there more leverage to sell the club at a better price.
If they dont get this Deal and we dont make champions league you get the feeling the investors are ready waiting to pounce to see how further vunerable Liverpool will be.
It might not be a bad thing
Warren Bloggs - November 8th, 2009 at 8:03 pm
Whatever the name it should have the slogon ‘..Gillett, the best a fan can get…’ underneath……lool
John - November 8th, 2009 at 9:27 pm
i reckon we should try for naming rights on players. so we should get BurgerKing to buy us Fat ronaldo in exchange for us having hes kit name as BurgerKing. i think its actually a pretty good idea.
Donavan Ried - November 9th, 2009 at 1:11 am
What ever the name of the stadium two things is for sure it will be the home of Liverpool Football Club, And it will still have a “Kop”,so bring it on ………
Retryboy - November 9th, 2009 at 1:14 am
United bring in £100m a year more than us purslow is doing a great job in trying to redress that balance. We want work to start on the stadium this will make it happen. Some companies to avoid though: 1-ferguson 2-gillette