Man City’s extraordinary decision to bring convicted paedophile Barry Bennell back to court

Posted by

When Football’s Darkest Secret was aired on UK terrestrial television a few weeks ago, no one who watched it could’ve failed to have been moved by the terrible ordeals that certain young players had to go through at some football clubs, Manchester City being one of them.

The programme, uncomfortable as it was at times, centred around the abuse of Barry Bennell, a convicted paedophile, and one or two other football coaches in a similar position of trust.

MORE: Embarrassing from Arsenal

Though Bennell has never pleaded guilty to the charges levelled against him, he has been convicted of them and is currently serving time in prison for them.

Now, however, in light of a compensation claim by eight of Bennell’s victims for personal injury, loss and damages, Man City have made a quite extraordinary decision.

Those who suffered at Barry Bennell’s hands may have to face him in court again

According to the Daily Mail, the club, via their insurers in the case, intend to bring Bennell back to court to testify as a defence witness.

‘At a late stage in this litigation, (the defence) has apparently taken the extraordinary decision to call Mr Bennell, presumably intending to put him forward as a witness of truth, despite the fact that he has repeatedly pleaded not guilty but been convicted of numerous sexual offences, including being convicted of 52 criminal offences in 2018, many on these claimants,’ a court document noted, cited in the Daily Mail.

If nothing else, it shows the contempt with which the club regards such an action, given that they seem prepared to ensure the accusers suffer once again at the hands of Bennell, this time from across a court room.

More Stories Barry Bennell


  1. What your article fails to mention is that very early on in this process Man City offered compensation beyond what would normally be expected via compensation court to all the victims. So the real question is why are these victims continuing with this compensation claim. It isn’t to add more time to his sentence it is because they are hoping for an even bigger payday. The insurance company (not City) are bound to do their best to minimise the amount they will have to pay that is what they do.

  2. “contempt with which the club regards such an action”

    You do realise that it is the insurers legal team who have done this? Who Man City have no say over? Who are completely separate to Man City? Any excuse to have a go at them though eh.

Comments are closed