Former Premier League ref suggests a more fitting punishment for Liverpool’s Virgil van Dijk

Posted by

Anyone who saw the way that Liverpool’s Virgil van Dijk reacted to his red card in the Newcastle game at the weekend will surely feel that the subsequent one match ban he’s received is insufficient.

The Dutchman was somewhat aggressive towards the officials and took an age to actually leave the field of play.

In many respects it was conduct unbecoming of a player that could be set to be the new Reds captain for many more years.

However, with the armband comes the responsibility of being the figurehead of the club on the pitch as well as an ambassador off it.

To that end, there’s a certain type of behaviour that has to be adhered to, and that plainly wasn’t on show at St. James’ Park.

Though van Dijk didn’t completely lose the plot, his antics were unsavoury at best, and former Premier League referee, Mark Halsey, believes the centre-back has got away lightly.

‘Van Dijk will rightly receive a one-match ban for the straight red card but I believe his suspension should be increased,’ he wrote in The Sun.

‘Of course, this will depend on Brooks’ official report but the abusive and insulting language used by the new Reds leader could be worthy of another RED CARD and result in an additional three-match ban.

‘That would rule out Van Dijk for four matches in total – a fitting punishment for his poor conduct.’

As someone who stood in the middle for many years, Halsey speaks from a position of authority, and his viewpoint needs to be listened too.

Being on the end of such tirades would be something Halsey knows only too well, and less leniency from this point onwards will surely act as a deterrent in future.

If a player understands such conduct is a four rather than one match ban, it’s a fair bet that they’ll think twice about their actions.

More Stories Jurgen Klopp Mark Halsey Virgil van Dijk

6 Comments

  1. Former ref Mark Clattenburg says that a straight red and possible further discipline is disgusting. He claims Isak wasn’t in control of the ball so VVD wasn’t fouling a goalscoring oppurtunity as Isak would have needed to be in control. Also the 4th official kept getting hold of VVD to try and calm him down and VVD told the 4th official to get off him. If a player kept grabbing hold of a ref then they would be red carded for abuse

  2. Expert former refs crawling out of the woodwork because it’s LFC. You don’t hear anything about Bruno on a Monday who does this 3 to four times per match. And it seems the author is in agreement with the corrupt officials. Try as you like, as shown at St James Park on Sunday, you’ll NEVER break our spirit

  3. Effectively a ban for swearing … when did you see a player not swear when he was sent-off ? most of them swear if they concede a throw in or if their shot goes wide. VVD referred to the decision as ‘a fxxxing joke’ and he’s right. As was Trent’s yellow card for being fouled and returning the ball for the throw in trying not to be carded for taking to long with the throw. How do you spell Vendetta ?

    1. Bruno Fernandez – 38 match ban for being a crying, buck-toothed cheat who brings the game into disrepute by running onto the pitch.

  4. VVD should know better no matter how upset he is, it has been blasted in every Newspaper how they’re clamping down on abuse at referees.

Comments are closed