Selling Harry Kane to Bayern Munich may have been one of the most difficult decisions that Tottenham chairman, Daniel Levy, has had to make during his tenure as club chairman, however, at this point, it’s looking like a win win.
The centre-forward is, as expected, ripping it up in the Bundesliga for the Bavarian giants, whilst Spurs are sitting pretty atop the Premier League table.
Indeed, any thoughts that Levy may have had regarding a backlash from fans of the north London outfit have quickly been dispelled thanks to Ange Postecoglou’s stunning start to life at White Hart Lane.
Kane’s shadow will hang over the club for a while yet, however, particularly when Bayern directors appear more than keen to rub salt into the wounds.
According to honorary Bayern president, Uli Hoeness, the Bavarians didn’t actually pay the amount for the centre-forward that has been quoted extensively in the press.
“We only spent 95 million (euros),” he told BR24.
Though it might only be a case of a few million pounds difference, it begs the question as to why a different figure was released to media organisations in the first place, and why Levy has let Kane leave for under €100m, when it was always believed that any offer below that amount would be rebuffed.
I think this is all being blown out of proportion. I mean, in the same position didn’t Man City get Haaland from Dortmund for just over £50 Million? He’s younger and more prolific too!
As someone who has watched Harry Kane for over 10 years at Spurs, I can say I would rather have Haaland in my team than Kane!
never in a million years harry kane is the best striker out there by a mile harland needs support from other players kane in a poor team can score from anywhere now at munich with good will go to another level
Harry is a more rounded player than Haaland will ever be! Lets see where Haaland is in 7-10 years?
Wow what a blindly stupid thing to say
Give Haaland 10 years in the EPL the same as Kane and then see if you still stick with that same statement.
Haaland fronts arguably the best supply line in club football and at this moment in time he should score goals even in his sleep but what else does he give to the game?
As you say You have been watching Kane for 10 years so how can you compare a two minute wonder to over a decade of top level play.
I am a NUFC fan so no loyalty to Kane, but I am neither blind nor stupid I can see where credit is due to be given, and 14 years at Spuds and with a 2 goals for every three games record, I doubt Haaland will come close to that.
Has Kane won anything yet?
Have they won anything yet?
To be honest that has to be one of the most moronic questions that ever gets to disturb the ether, when it’s asked about a single individual involved in a team sport.
And is a clear indication that the spouter of the said banal moronism has not a clue.
There are literally hundreds of utter donkeys that have shiny little dust collectors on their mantle pieces purely and simpy because they were in the right team at the right moment.
And then there is the likes of PSG with their expensively assembled squad of “worlds greatest” and 15 attempts later have still not won the UCL trophy.
So thats a NO then