Chelsea striker ‘didn’t want to take penalty’ against Manchester United
by stresster on May 23rd, 2008We asked yesterday whether there was a bottler or two in the Chelsea camp when it came to taking penalties and the answer appears in today’s Daily Mail. Nicolas Anelka may well have stepped up to take a spot-kick for the Blues, but he was actually on the original list of five takers, only for the Frenchman to decline the polite invitation. Despite being a striker and previous penalty-taker for Bolton and Manchester City.
Anelka said: “I did not think for a moment I was going to come on.
“I had remained sitting on the bench and suddenly they asked me to play — not even a minute after sending me to warm up.
“I do not know if that has happened before in a Champions League Final, in a match of such intensity, that a player is sent onto the pitch without having warmed up.
“When you come on you should at least be ready to make some runs.”
The penalty miss capped a disappointing 2008 for Anelka, who has struggled to make an impact since his £15million arrival in January. He has also cast doubt over his Stamford Bridge future by questioning Avram Grant’s decision to cast him as a wide player. Perhaps he’ll get the chance to play more central when Didier Drogba buggers off.
He said: “Since I arrived at Chelsea I have never been played in my position. Never as a second striker, always on the left and right. I have said nothing until now.
“When I came here they told me I would play in a 4-4-2. I did not join to play on the right or left. I no longer have any need to prove what I am worth playing in the middle.
“I could have played up front with Didier.
He wanted that as well but our partnership has never even been tried in training.
“We must have played together for half an hour.”
We're giving you £10 FREE so show some bollocks and BET NOW!
Tagged Under: Anelka, avram grant, Bolton FC, Chelsea FC, drogba, john terry, Manchester City FC, Manchester United, nicolas anelka, penalties



hunt - May 23rd, 2008 at 6:48 pm
john terry is a fan favourite at chelsea and most of the fans would be more sympathetic to him. i expect them to be annoyed but not as annoyed as they will be with anelka. especially cause he missed the decisive penalty. he has only been at chelsea for a few months compared to john terry and so the fans don’t like him as much. so i feel sorry for him. i think anelka is gonna join his 10th club soon.
Bingo - May 23rd, 2008 at 8:41 pm
As a City fan I totally expected Anelka to score his penalty. It wasn’t his best penalty but keeper deserves credit too. JT was unlucky with his slip but I’m not his biggest fan so wasn’t too disappointed, and as a neutral it was nice to see the extra drama unfold after an excellent 120 minutes.
ofortuna - May 23rd, 2008 at 10:33 pm
as a city fan I knew anelka would miss..any striker who let’s left backs step up before them is a total bottler..a striker not wanting to strike a ball on the biggest stage of all is a total wast of space..he went on and on about himself being cl player then girlies out of a chance to be a hero by not being in the first five. He got as many faces as he has had transfers.
Richard - May 23rd, 2008 at 10:47 pm
I don’t know anyone who is sympathetic to Terry. He had it coming from the day one. No-one likes him because he’s a thug.
ofortuna - May 24th, 2008 at 7:31 am
I was gutted when terry missed…and felt for him cos it was genuine slip..at least he had balls where anelka did not..also I really would have enjoyed it’d losing final because of the preening ponce missing his penalty