Gary Neville praises Chelsea tactic that “shocked Arsenal” and kept key Gunners player quiet

Posted by

Manchester United legend Gary Neville has analysed yesterday’s game between Chelsea and Arsenal at Stamford Bridge, with a thrilling encounter in this London Derby ending in a 2-2 draw.

Chelsea took a 2-0 lead thanks to goals from Cole Palmer and Mykhaylo Mudryk, before a late comeback saw Declan Rice and Leandro Trossard score to ensure the Gunners took a share of the spoils.

Speaking to Sky Sports afterwards, Neville was full of praise for Mauricio Pochettino’s tactical set-up, as the Chelsea midfield worked well to stifle the threat of key Arsenal creative player Martin Odegaard, who was uncharacteristically quiet when he’s so often had a big impact in big games like this in the past.

See below as Neville offered his explanation as to how the midfield three of Conor Gallagher, Moises Caicedo, Cole Palmer and Enzo Fernandez worked well to limit Odegaard’s opportunities to work his magic as usual…

“Structurally, defensively, they were fantastic,” Neville said. “They did what Brighton do and sort of had Gallagher and Palmer coming back into number ten positions, and it sort of shocked Arsenal.

“They couldn’t get the ball into Odegaard, Arsenal, because of that midfield four … Mauricio Pochettino is a top coach and I think he’ll enjoy developing these players.”

While Chelsea will be disappointed to see this game slip away, Neville is probably right that Pochettino will have plenty of positives to take from it as well.

More Stories Gary Neville Martin Odegaard Mauricio Pochettino

2 Comments

  1. The results of matches don’t always tell the true story especially when refereeing becomes controversial. True Arsenal were poor, but they stll would have beaten Chelsea with another referee.
    There’s was obvious an Arsenal penalty not given and the Chelsea one was controversial.

    Secondly, Arteta is continuously shooting himself in the foot by refusing to play the Partey/Rice combination which has not yet disappointed us in any great game.

    Everyone is beginning to think it’s better to use Havertz in an advanced role because the midfield hasn’t done him any good.

Comments are closed