Manchester United manager Michael Carrick made a questionable tactical decision by playing Bruno Fernandes as a striker against Como, as the Portuguese midfielder struggled to influence the game during a disastrous Champions League outing.
United suffered a humiliating 4-1 defeat to the Italian side, exposing major problems in their attack. With Benjamin Sesko out with injury, Carrick moved his captain into a more advanced role, but the experiment failed to deliver.
Bruno Fernandes looked uncomfortable in an unfamiliar role
Fernandes is undoubtedly one of Manchester United’s most creative players, but his greatest strengths lie in dictating play, finding pockets of space and creating opportunities for his teammates. Playing as a centre-forward restricted his ability to influence proceedings in the areas where he is most dangerous.
The 31-year-old isn’t a natural striker, and expecting him to lead the line against an organised Como defence was always a risk. Rather than consistently getting into goalscoring positions, he needed to drop deeper to receive possession and help United progress through midfield.
Former England and Tottenham manager Glenn Hoddle highlighted Fernandes’ frustration, noting that the midfielder berated his teammates because nobody was pressing alongside him. His observations underlined the collective problems affecting United, with their lack of coordination making it difficult to regain possession.
Hoddle said on BBC: “That’s a shock for me. It really is. For me, Bruno Fernandes is better when he’s playing deeper. Once he’s faced up, and has runners off him, he can pick people out like the ball he played to Amad. He’s not happy is he? Look, he’s looking at the bench.”
Erik ten Hag makes claim about working with “emotional” Man United player who still divides opinion
Want more CaughtOffside coverage? Add us as a preferred source on Google to your favourites list for news you can trust.
Carrick should restore Fernandes to his natural position
Carrick must reconsider his approach if United are to improve their performances. Fernandes should operate as a No. 10, where his vision, passing range and ability to deliver decisive final balls can make a genuine difference.
Playing behind a recognised striker would let him link midfield and attack while arriving late in the box to exploit defensive gaps. Bryan Mbeumo could be a better emergency option up front, having shown he can contribute goals while adapting to different attacking roles.
United’s defeat cannot be blamed on one selection decision alone, but using Fernandes as a makeshift striker clearly failed to solve their attacking problems. Carrick must find a more effective solution rather than sacrificing his captain’s greatest qualities.
Just in: Bruno Fernandes linked with shock January exit from Man United
Playing three luxury players who are all 10s and offer very little in any other position is and was suicidal from the start! Bruno, Telemans and Mount in one team? Plain suicidal!!!
I supported Carrick up to this point but not playing Baleba beside Sanchez was incomprehensible. And playing Maguire and De ligt in defence was daft, too. Heaven had a funny tummy? Tell him to put his fkn boots on!
And up front? Play Zirkzee, there is no other choice and he can play given the chance. Lacey? Why does he never get on the pitch, the kid can play so give Amad an hour and him 30 mins!! It isn’t rocket science.
And tonight? Carrick proved he has no balls when he didn’t pull the arm waving Bruno after 20 minutes. Get him off when he’s so pathetic. If he’d brought on Baleba at that point we were still in the match.
Tielemans should have been off too, along with Mount, put kids on the pitch, at least they can play football!!